Home/Appeals & Reviews/Judicial Review

Judicial Review

Overview

✦Judicial Review of Migration Decisions

Judicial review involves applying to a federal court to determine whether a migration decision made by the Department of Home Affairs or the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) was made according to law.

Unlike merits review, the Court does not reconsider the facts, re-evaluate the evidence, or decide whether a visa should be granted.

Instead, the Court considers whether the decision-maker made a jurisdictional or other reviewable legal error that affected the validity of the decision.

Common Grounds of Jurisdictional Error

A court may set aside a migration decision where a jurisdictional or other reviewable legal error has occurred. Common examples include:

1. Denial of Procedural Fairness

The decision-maker failed to provide a genuine opportunity to respond to information that was relevant to the outcome of the decision.

2. Misapplication of the Law

The decision-maker misunderstood or incorrectly applied the relevant legislation, applied the wrong legal test, or failed to exercise the power according to law.

3. Failure to Consider Relevant Matters

The decision-maker considered matters that were legally irrelevant or failed to consider matters that the law required to be taken into account.

4. Legal Unreasonableness or No Evidence

The decision was legally unreasonable, irrational, or based on findings that were unsupported by the available evidence.

Where Judicial Review Happens

Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (FCFCOA)

Most migration judicial review applications are commenced in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2).

Federal Court of Australia

The Federal Court hears appeals from the FCFCOA and certain migration matters at first instance where jurisdiction is conferred by law.

High Court of Australia

The High Court has original constitutional jurisdiction and hears only a limited number of exceptional migration matters involving significant legal or constitutional questions.

The Practical Realities

The Time Limits

Applications for judicial review are subject to strict statutory time limits. The applicable time limit depends on the type of decision and the relevant legislation. Missing a filing deadline may result in losing the opportunity to challenge the decision, although the Court has limited powers to extend time in certain circumstances. Obtaining legal advice promptly is therefore essential.

An honest assessment first

Not every unfavourable migration decision involves a jurisdictional error. Judicial review focuses on legal errors rather than whether the decision was fair or whether the Court would have reached a different conclusion. Court proceedings can involve significant time, legal costs, and the potential for an adverse costs order. Before commencing proceedings, we carefully assess the decision, identify any arguable legal errors, and provide clear, practical advice about the available options and prospects of success.

Test the Legality of the Decision — Properly

Judicial review requires the identification of a genuine legal error supported by the relevant legislation and case law.

We carefully analyse the decision, identify any jurisdictional or other reviewable legal errors, prepare comprehensive submissions, and where appropriate, work with experienced specialist counsel to represent clients throughout the court process.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is judicial review?

Judicial review is a court process that examines whether a migration decision was made according to law. Unlike merits review, the Court does not reconsider the facts or decide whether a visa should be granted.

What kinds of legal errors can lead to judicial review?

Common grounds include denial of procedural fairness, applying the wrong legal test, failing to consider relevant matters, considering irrelevant matters, legal unreasonableness, or other jurisdictional or reviewable legal errors recognised by Australian law.

Can the Court grant me a visa?

Generally, no. If the Court finds that a legal error occurred, it will usually set aside the decision and require the matter to be reconsidered according to law by the appropriate decision-maker.

Are there time limits for judicial review?

Yes. Judicial review applications are subject to strict statutory time limits. Because these deadlines vary depending on the circumstances, legal advice should be obtained as soon as possible after receiving the decision.

Why Choose Yantra Legal?

Choosing a lawyer is about more than legal knowledge. You want someone who will listen, understand your situation, and guide you with honesty and care. That's how we work at Yantra Legal.

Lived Migration Experience

Having lived in Nepal, Germany and Australia, we understand what it feels like to build a new life in a different country. We know that migration matters often involve family, work, uncertainty and important life decisions—not just paperwork.

Direct Access to Your Solicitor

When you choose Yantra Legal, you work directly with our solicitor, Krishna Giri from your first consultation until your matter is finalised. Your case is not passed between different staff members, so you always know who is handling your matter.

Clear & Honest Advice

Legal advice should be clear, not confusing. We explain your options in plain English and, where helpful, in Nepali or Hindi, so you can make informed decisions with confidence.

Truly Personalised Representation

No two legal matters are the same. We take the time to understand your circumstances, your goals and what matters most to you. Our advice is tailored to your situation rather than following a one-size-fits-all approach.

Fixed-Fee Transparency

We believe you should know what to expect before you proceed. We offer fixed-fee initial consultations and provide clear information about legal costs, so there are no unexpected surprises.

Choosing a lawyer is about more than legal knowledge. You want someone who will listen, understand your situation, and guide you with honesty and care. That's how we work at Yantra Legal.

Lived ExperienceDirect Solicitor AccessClear & Honest AdvicePersonalised RepresentationFixed-Fee Transparency

Explore Judicial Review Options for Your Case

Judicial review focuses on whether a migration decision was made according to law. If you believe a legal error may have affected your case, obtaining timely legal advice can help you understand whether court review is available. We provide practical advice to assess potential grounds for judicial review and guide clients through the court process where appropriate.

⚠️ Why Seek Advice Early?

Time limits apply to most appeals, review applications, and judicial review matters. In many cases, strict deadlines begin from the date of the decision. Seeking legal advice early can significantly improve your understanding of available options and help ensure that important rights are not missed.

Strict time limits apply to most appeals and review processes. Early advice can help protect your legal options and improve your chances of a positive outcome.